How Obama Denied Conservative Judges a Vote

How Obama Denied Conservative Judges a Vote: Conservative nominees were blocked from 4 to 6 years

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Long Standing Suspicion Confirmed: SNOPES IS BOGUS!

Long Standing Suspicion Confirmed: SNOPES IS BOGUS!

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Trump and the Country Class

President Obama has a pen, and he hasn’t been afraid to use it. (His transformational writing instrument of choice is really a stubby, unsharpened pencil with a well-worn eraser, but that’s another story.)

Presidential candidate Trump,…

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Billionaire Charles Koch: Socialist Bernie Sanders and I Agree, It’s a Rigged System | The Stream

Libertarian-Leaning Billionaire Charles Koch: Socialist Bernie Sanders and I Agree, It’s a Rigged System | The Stream: According to Koch, Bernie isn’t wrong that we have a rigged system. Where he errs is in expanding government control over these economic decisions.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Apple on encryption

February 16, 2016A Message to Our Customers

The United States government has demanded that Apple take an unprecedented step which threatens the security of our customers. We oppose this order, which has implications far beyond the legal case at hand. 
This moment calls for public discussion, and we want our customers and people around the country to understand what is at stake.

The Need for Encryption

Smartphones, led by iPhone, have become an essential part of our lives. People use them to store an incredible amount of personal information, from our private conversations to our photos, our music, our notes, our calendars and contacts, our financial information and health data, even where we have been and where we are going.
All that information needs to be protected from hackers and criminals who want to access it, steal it, and use it without our knowledge or permission. Customers expect Apple and other technology companies to do everything in our power to protect their personal information, and at Apple we are deeply committed to safeguarding their data.
Compromising the security of our personal information can ultimately put our personal safety at risk. That is why encryption has become so important to all of us.
For many years, we have used encryption to protect our customers’ personal data because we believe it’s the only way to keep their information safe. We have even put that data out of our own reach, because we believe the contents of your iPhone are none of our business.

The San Bernardino Case

We were shocked and outraged by the deadly act of terrorism in San Bernardino last December. We mourn the loss of life and want justice for all those whose lives were affected. The FBI asked us for help in the days following the attack, and we have worked hard to support the government’s efforts to solve this horrible crime. We have no sympathy for terrorists.
When the FBI has requested data that’s in our possession, we have provided it. Apple complies with valid subpoenas and search warrants, as we have in the San Bernardino case. We have also made Apple engineers available to advise the FBI, and we’ve offered our best ideas on a number of investigative options at their disposal.
We have great respect for the professionals at the FBI, and we believe their intentions are good. Up to this point, we have done everything that is both within our power and within the law to help them. But now the U.S. government has asked us for something we simply do not have, and something we consider too dangerous to create. They have asked us to build a backdoor to the iPhone.
Specifically, the FBI wants us to make a new version of the iPhone operating system, circumventing several important security features, and install it on an iPhone recovered during the investigation. In the wrong hands, this software — which does not exist today — would have the potential to unlock any iPhone in someone’s physical possession.
The FBI may use different words to describe this tool, but make no mistake: Building a version of iOS that bypasses security in this way would undeniably create a backdoor. And while the government may argue that its use would be limited to this case, there is no way to guarantee such control.

The Threat to Data Security

Some would argue that building a backdoor for just one iPhone is a simple, clean-cut solution. But it ignores both the basics of digital security and the significance of what the government is demanding in this case.
In today’s digital world, the “key” to an encrypted system is a piece of information that unlocks the data, and it is only as secure as the protections around it. Once the information is known, or a way to bypass the code is revealed, the encryption can be defeated by anyone with that knowledge.
The government suggests this tool could only be used once, on one phone. But that’s simply not true. Once created, the technique could be used over and over again, on any number of devices. In the physical world, it would be the equivalent of a master key, capable of opening hundreds of millions of locks — from restaurants and banks to stores and homes. No reasonable person would find that acceptable.
The government is asking Apple to hack our own users and undermine decades of security advancements that protect our customers — including tens of millions of American citizens — from sophisticated hackers and cybercriminals. The same engineers who built strong encryption into the iPhone to protect our users would, ironically, be ordered to weaken those protections and make our users less safe.
We can find no precedent for an American company being forced to expose its customers to a greater risk of attack. For years, cryptologists and national security experts have been warning against weakening encryption. Doing so would hurt only the well-meaning and law-abiding citizens who rely on companies like Apple to protect their data. Criminals and bad actors will still encrypt, using tools that are readily available to them.

A Dangerous Precedent

Rather than asking for legislative action through Congress, the FBI is proposing an unprecedented use of the All Writs Act of 1789 to justify an expansion of its authority.
The government would have us remove security features and add new capabilities to the operating system, allowing a passcode to be input electronically. This would make it easier to unlock an iPhone by “brute force,” trying thousands or millions of combinations with the speed of a modern computer.
The implications of the government’s demands are chilling. If the government can use the All Writs Act to make it easier to unlock your iPhone, it would have the power to reach into anyone’s device to capture their data. The government could extend this breach of privacy and demand that Apple build surveillance software to intercept your messages, access your health records or financial data, track your location, or even access your phone’s microphone or camera without your knowledge.
Opposing this order is not something we take lightly. We feel we must speak up in the face of what we see as an overreach by the U.S. government.
We are challenging the FBI’s demands with the deepest respect for American democracy and a love of our country. We believe it would be in the best interest of everyone to step back and consider the implications.
While we believe the FBI’s intentions are good, it would be wrong for the government to force us to build a backdoor into our products. And ultimately, we fear that this demand would undermine the very freedoms and liberty our government is meant to protect.
Tim Cook
According to the AP, soon-to-be-heroic technicians have uncovered 22 million email messages from the George W. Bush administration—far more than the Bush White House said they’d lost in the first place.
That’s a lot of emails—but not as much data as you might first think. Berkeley estimated in 2003 the average email size to be around 18,500 bytes. That’s about 379 gigabytes of lost email, give or take a few Powerpoint attachments with slides missing in the “Find a reason to invade Iraq” section.
Restoration of missing emails promises to be the trickiest part of the settlement agreement. The White House first ran into archiving problems in 2003, but didn’t begin to address the problem until October 2005. Only in the final days of the Bush administration did the White House begin working with contractors-including software giant Microsoft-to find missing messages.
Don’t expect to see these for a while. The National Archives have to sift through the emails before they’ll be released to the public. But expect a thousand Freedom of Information Act requests to let fly towards Washington in the meantime. [Telegram/AP]
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Obama threatens Justices in his SOTU, and then they die

Was Scalia Murdered ? 
Forget “Conspiracy Theory” This is Real
by Jon Rappoport
February 16, 2016
“Scalia’s Federal Protection had been removed while he was at the Texas ranch.”
Let’s jump right in with quotes from the Washington Post, 2/15, “Conspiracy theories swirl around the death of Antonin Scalia”. 
The Post published extraordinary statements from the Facebook page of “William O. Ritchie, former head of criminal investigations for D.C. police”:
“As a former homicide commander, I am stunned that no autopsy was ordered for Justice Scalia.”
“You have a Supreme Court Justice who died, not in attendance of a physician. 
You have a non-homicide trained US Marshal tell the justice of peace that no foul play was observed.
You have a justice of the peace pronounce death while not being on the scene and without any medical training opining that the justice died of a heart attack.
What medical proof exists of a myocardial Infarction?
Why not a cerebral hemorrhage?”
“How can the Marshal say, without a thorough post mortem, that he was not injected with an illegal substance that would simulate a heart attack…”
“Did the US Marshal check for petechial hemorrhage in his eyes or under his lips that would have suggested suffocation?
Did the US Marshal smell his breath for any unusual odor that might suggest poisoning?
My gut tells me there is something fishy going on in Texas.”
If this isn’t enough, the Post goes on:
“Scalia’s physician, Brian Monahan, is a U.S. Navy rear admiral and the attending physician for the U.S. Congress and Supreme Court.
He declined to comment on Scalia’s [prior] health when reached by telephone Monday at his home in Maryland.
“‘Patient confidentiality forbids me to make any comment on the subject,’ he said.”
“When asked whether he planned to make public the statement he’s preparing for [Texas Judge] Guevara, Monahan repeated the same statement and hung up on a reporter.”
As long as no law-enforcement investigation of Scalia’s death is launched, the doctor is justified. 
Confidentiality applies, unless Scalia’s family lifts it. 
But if such an investigation is opened, all bets are off. 
Confidentiality no longer applies.
There are reports that, after Scalia’s body was transported from the celebrity ranch in Texas, closely guarded and shielded by a bevy of marshals, it was rapidly embalmed. 
If so, that would apparently make toxicological tests far more difficult or impossible. 
As for a murder motive, try: upsetting the voting balance of the US Supreme Court. 
Try: a push to appoint a new Justice now, thus ensuring the appointee’s political persuasion, regardless of the outcome of the 2016 Presidential election. 
Try: attempting to shift the Court’s voting balance in upcoming cases on Guns, Abortion, Immigration and Obamacare.
Dismiss the comfortable notion that “this couldn’t happen.” 
JFK couldn’t have been murdered, but he was. 
High political figures don’t carry special immunity. 
Dismiss assurances from incompetents in Texas that Scalia died of natural causes, and dismiss the press repeating these assurances – -which add up to: nothing.
Dismiss calls for “propriety in a time of grief.” 
Dismiss whatever opinions, pro and con, circulate now about Scalia, his points of view, his decisions, his character, his life. 
They’re irrelevant to the facts of his death. 
Those facts are as clear as mud.
Dismiss the typical accusations of “conspiracy theory.” 
It’s no theory when key facts are unknown and incompetents supplied the current “information.”
In addition to what I’ve cited above, count as relevant the fact that Scalia’s Federal Protection had been removed while he was at the Texas ranch. 
We’re told Scalia [supposedly] didn’t want that protection. 
Maybe yes, maybe no. 
[Isn’t is a fine “coincidence” that he dies the very same day he is not under Federal Protection?]
We’re also told Scalia’s family [supposedly] didn’t want an autopsy. 
Again, maybe yes, maybe no. 
The family has been silent. 
Or if not, their statements aren’t being reported.
Consider, as potentially relevant, the report that Scalia was found with a pillow over his head.
Consider, as relevant, that Judge Guevara, deciding without seeing the body that Scalia died from natural causes, ruled against doing an autopsy – -and a counter-opinion, offered unofficially by another Texas judge, Bishop, that she would have wanted an autopsy.
Concerning Judge Guevara, this may or may not be relevant – reports, “Judge Cinderela Guevara: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know”:
“This isn’t the first time Guevara has been the source of controversy.
In 2013, Melaney Parker Rayburn was found dead after being hit by a train in Marfa, Texas…
Liz Parker, Melaney’s mom, questioned how Guevara handled the investigation of her daughter’s death, The Daily Kos reported.
Melaney was hit by a Union Pacific Railroad train and, Liz [her mother] wrote, a Union Pacific representative told her that it appeared that her body had been placed on the tracks while she was unconscious.
Liz asked the Justice of the Peace and the Sheriff to open the case as a homicide investigation, but they would not.
Guevara, who was a Justice of the Peace at the time, did not order a rape kit or an autopsy, Liz wrote, because a doctor at the scene said the cause of death was obvious.
“Liz later wrote a letter to the editor, published on Big Bend Now, in which she said that Guevara had asked for God to give her an answer about whether Melaney’s death was suicide.
Liz wrote that Guevara told her: ‘Yes, this was a tragedy, but the true tragedy was that she died without accepting Jesus Christ as her savior.'”
Bottom line so far: Any reasonable law-enforcement agency would immediately open an investigation into Scalia’s death. 
Failing to do so would rate as aiding and abetting a concealment of the truth, whatever that turns out to be.
You can find this article and more at
Please pass this on
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Intern Workshop

Conservative Intern Workshop
Date: Thursday, March 10
12:00 p.m. – 6:00 p.m.
Location: LI’s Steven P.J. Wood Building at the Clarendon metro (orange line)
Cost: Free (includes lunch) 

Sign Up Today

Following the workshop, put your new networking skills to the test and join your fellow interns, including Leadership Institute interns, at a networking Happy Hour and Debate Watch Party at Hard Times Café.

During this workshop, you will learn to:

  • stand out in your office
  • edit your resume effectively
  • transition from your internship to full-time employment
  • interview with confidence

This training is the perfect opportunity for you to network with young professionals and meet established professionals in Washington, DC.

Your internship is more than getting coffee and filing papers.  Your internship is about seeking out opportunities and accepting opportunities — all while enjoying what Washington, DC has to offer.  Space is limited, so register here to reserve your spot.


Paul Alfonse
Intern Coordinator

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment